🔗 Share this article

Across several weeks, coercive communications continued. At first, allegedly from a former police officer and an ex-military commander, and then from the authorities. In the end, a local artisan states he was ordered to the local precinct and warned explicitly: remain silent or face serious consequences.

This third-generation resident is among those fighting a multimillion-dollar initiative where this historic settlement – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – will be bulldozed and redeveloped by a multinational conglomerate.

"The unique ecosystem of the slum is exceptional in the globe," states the resident. "Yet their intention is to destroy our way of life and silence our voices."

Contrasting Realities

The cramped lanes of this community stand in sharp opposition to the high-rise structures and Bollywood penthouses that overshadow the area. Dwellings are assembled randomly and typically lacking adequate facilities, small-scale operations release harmful emissions and the environment is filled with the overpowering odor of exposed drainage.

For certain residents, the vision of a renewed Dharavi into a glistening neighborhood of luxury high-rises, organized recreational areas, modern retail complexes and residences with multiple bathrooms is an aspirational dream come true.

"We don't have proper healthcare, paved pathways or water management and we have no places for kids to enjoy," says A Selvin Nadar, fifty-six, who relocated from his home state in the early eighties. "The single option is to clear the area and provide modern residences."

Resident Opposition

But others, such as this protester, are resisting the project.

Everyone acknowledges that Dharavi, long neglected as an illegal encroachment, is desperately requiring financial support and improvement. Yet they are concerned that this project – absent of community input – could potentially convert a piece of prime Mumbai real estate into a luxury development, displacing the marginalized, migrant communities who have resided there since the late 1800s.

This involved these shunned, migrant workers who established the uninhabited area into a frequently examined example of community resilience and commercial output, whose production is estimated at between one million dollars and a substantial sum annually, making it one of the world's largest unofficial markets.

Relocation Worries

Out of about one million residents living in the packed sprawling neighborhood, fewer than half will be qualified for alternative accommodation in the redevelopment, which is expected to take an extended timeframe to complete. Others will be relocated to barren areas and saline fields on the far outskirts of the city, risking fragment a long-established neighborhood. Some will receive no housing at all.

Residents permitted to stay in the neighborhood will be allocated flats in multi-story structures, a significant rupture from the organic, communal way of living and working that has maintained Dharavi for so long.

Businesses from tailoring to ceramic crafts and material recovery are expected to shrink in number and be transferred to an allocated "industrial sector" separated from people's residences.

Livelihood Crisis

For those such as Shaikh, a workshop owner and multi-generational of his family to reside in the slum, the redevelopment presents a survival challenge. His makeshift, three-storey facility makes leather coats – formal jackets, premium outerwear, studded bomber jackets – marketed in luxury boutiques in south Mumbai and internationally.

His family lives in the rooms downstairs and his workers and sewers – migrants from different regions – reside there, enabling him to manage costs. Beyond Dharavi's enclave, Mumbai rents are often 10 times more expensive for basic accommodation.

Harassment and Intimidation

In the government offices nearby, a conceptual model of the Dharavi project illustrates a very different outlook. Well-groomed inhabitants mill about on cycles and electric vehicles, purchasing continental baguettes and breakfast items and having coffee on an outdoor area near a restaurant and dessert parlor. It is a complete departure from the inexpensive idli sambar first meal and 5-rupee chai that sustains the neighborhood.

"This isn't progress for residents," says the protester. "It represents a huge property transaction that will price people out for us to survive."

Additionally, there exists distrust of the business conglomerate. Run by a prominent businessman – a leading figure and a supporter of the Indian prime minister – the conglomerate has been subject to claims of favoritism and ethical concerns, which it denies.

While local authorities labels it a partnership, the developer contributed nearly a billion dollars for its majority share. A case stating that the project was improperly granted to the developer is under review in India's supreme court.

Ongoing Pressure

From when they initiated to publicly resist the development, local opponents state they have been experienced ongoing efforts of harassment and intimidation – including messages, explicit warnings and insinuations that speaking against the development was tantamount to opposing national interests – by individuals they claim are associated with the corporate group.

Among those alleged to have making intimidations is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c